Mecklenburg ACTS
    Working for equity and excellence in ALL Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
    • Home
    • Opt-Out/Refusal
      • “Opting out” or “refusing”?
        • Potential consequences of opting out of/refusing state exams
        • Opt-out/refusal code of ethics
        • Suggested opt-out/refusal procedure
          • NCDPI statement on test procedures
          • Opt-Out Petition
          • North Carolina test timeline
      • Articles on NC opt-out/refusal
      • Research on High-Stakes Testing
        • Alternatives to high-stakes testing
        • High-stakes tests and Common Core
        • Sample High-Stakes Testing Letter
      • The New York opt-out/refusal movement
    • Read to Achieve
      • Politics-driven Read to Achieve a path to failure for NC
      • NC must rethink Read to Achieve because retention leads to more dropouts
      • Dear Senator Berger
      • Enough Is Enough: Why I Withdrew My Daughter From Public School
      • Holding Kids Back Doesn’t Help Them
      • National Association of School Psychologists on Retention
      • Fear and Loathing in a Florida School
    • Archive
      • History
      • Observer articles & coverage
      • Statements to BOE
        • Equity – history
          • Comparing student scores at CMS middle schools
      • DNC 2012
        • DNC Media Coverage
        • Pam and Carol’s Excellent Students First Adventure
        • Moms on the Loose: Pam and Carol Meet DFER
        • A Better Place: Reflections on Education and the DNC
      • #1DayTA

    Much Read to Achieve Work Ahead

    June 6, 2014

      The grim saga of Read to Achieve continues.

      On Thursday, June 5, the North Carolina House voted 73-40 to concur with H230, the Senate’s proposed changes to Read to Achieve (see here for bill text and vote tallies). Particular thanks go to the bipartisan group of House members who voted not to concur, in an effort to create an opportunity for further discussion about this highly important (and currently highly destructive) piece of education policy.

      The changes make some improvements to Read to Achieve. They exempt a wider range of special needs students from the retention requirements, provide greater flexibility regarding summer school, and make some modifications to testing and portfolio requirements.

      In our estimation, however, the changes will do little to improve the experience of most third graders in the coming year.

      The high stakes still attached to reading test scores will continue to spawn unacceptable amounts of test prep and anxiety.

      The changes do nothing for the many children who are still likely to face mandatory retention under the program, despite copious evidence that for most children, retention does more harm than good.

      The program also continues to lack needed investments in reading interventions in earlier grades.

      MecklenburgACTS.org will continue to work to mobilize parents across North Carolina to press for broader changes to Read to Achieve in the next legislative session. If you are interested in helping to mobilize parents at your school or in your community, please e-mail us at info@mecklenburgacts.org.

      More information about Read to Achieve, including perspectives from experts and from parents, can be found in the Read to Achieve section of this website.

      Related Posts

      Equity /

      Moving On

      Equity /

      Human endeavor vs. business transaction

      Equity /

      Thoughts on CMS Assignment

      ‹ Senate Read to Achieve Action Not Bold Enough › 2013-14 Test Refusals Successful

      Recent Posts

      • Moving On
      • Human endeavor vs. business transaction
      • Thoughts on CMS Assignment
      • New State Superintendent sticks with testing status quo
      • FairTest Issues New Assessment Recommendations

      Previous Posts

      Back to Top

      © Mecklenburg ACTS 2025