Mecklenburg ACTS
    Working for equity and excellence in ALL Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
    • Home
    • Opt-Out/Refusal
      • “Opting out” or “refusing”?
        • Potential consequences of opting out of/refusing state exams
        • Opt-out/refusal code of ethics
        • Suggested opt-out/refusal procedure
          • NCDPI statement on test procedures
          • Opt-Out Petition
          • North Carolina test timeline
      • Articles on NC opt-out/refusal
      • Research on High-Stakes Testing
        • Alternatives to high-stakes testing
        • High-stakes tests and Common Core
        • Sample High-Stakes Testing Letter
      • The New York opt-out/refusal movement
    • Read to Achieve
      • Politics-driven Read to Achieve a path to failure for NC
      • NC must rethink Read to Achieve because retention leads to more dropouts
      • Dear Senator Berger
      • Enough Is Enough: Why I Withdrew My Daughter From Public School
      • Holding Kids Back Doesn’t Help Them
      • National Association of School Psychologists on Retention
      • Fear and Loathing in a Florida School
    • Archive
      • History
      • Observer articles & coverage
      • Statements to BOE
        • Equity – history
          • Comparing student scores at CMS middle schools
      • DNC 2012
        • DNC Media Coverage
        • Pam and Carol’s Excellent Students First Adventure
        • Moms on the Loose: Pam and Carol Meet DFER
        • A Better Place: Reflections on Education and the DNC
      • #1DayTA

    Legislative Update

    June 22, 2012

      The NC House and Senate passed a budget that includes items that had been in separate education bills.

      The good news

      – Teacher career status remains intact.  Teachers will not be force to accept short term contracts.

      – Corporate tax credits for private school vouchers did NOT become law.

      – Teachers can expect a tiny raise, 1.2%.

      The bad news

      Each district will be required to submit a pay for performance plan, which is likely to raise the stakes on state tests even higher. The good news: districts are not required to implement the plans in 2013-14.

      The budget requires that each school receive a grade of A to F, based solely on students’ test score performance. It also requires that each grade be widely publicized. The grades will not reflect student growth. Rather than improving education in our state, as its sponsors claim, this short-sighted decision is likely to have the opposite effect.

      The K-8 school “grades” are based only on three End of Grade (EOG) subjects: third through eighth grade math and reading, and fifth through eighth grade science scores. History suggests that the subsequent pressure to improve school grades is likely to lead to unintended negative consequences for students.

      We learned from the now repudiated federal No Child Left Behind legislation that high-stakes tests in selected subjects narrow the curriculum. Many subjects essential to a well-rounded education, among them social studies, history, art, music, foreign language and technology, don’t count towards a school’s “grade” and are likely to be given short shrift. Equally damaging for students, the fastest way for a school to improve its “grade” will to focus its efforts at raising the performance of children just at or below proficient.  The needs of gifted students can be ignored, as they will pass the test anyway. Likewise, the educational needs of very low performing students can be marginalized if they are deemed unlikely to pass the test in any given year.

       

       

      Related Posts

      Equity /

      Moving On

      Equity /

      Human endeavor vs. business transaction

      Equity /

      Thoughts on CMS Assignment

      ‹ Testing and SB 795 › Addressing the Real Needs of Teachers and Students

      Recent Posts

      • Moving On
      • Human endeavor vs. business transaction
      • Thoughts on CMS Assignment
      • New State Superintendent sticks with testing status quo
      • FairTest Issues New Assessment Recommendations

      Previous Posts

      Back to Top

      © Mecklenburg ACTS 2023