Mecklenburg ACTS
    Working for equity and excellence in ALL Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
    • Home
    • Opt-Out/Refusal
      • “Opting out” or “refusing”?
        • Potential consequences of opting out of/refusing state exams
        • Opt-out/refusal code of ethics
        • Suggested opt-out/refusal procedure
          • NCDPI statement on test procedures
          • Opt-Out Petition
          • North Carolina test timeline
      • Articles on NC opt-out/refusal
      • Research on High-Stakes Testing
        • Alternatives to high-stakes testing
        • High-stakes tests and Common Core
        • Sample High-Stakes Testing Letter
      • The New York opt-out/refusal movement
    • Read to Achieve
      • Politics-driven Read to Achieve a path to failure for NC
      • NC must rethink Read to Achieve because retention leads to more dropouts
      • Dear Senator Berger
      • Enough Is Enough: Why I Withdrew My Daughter From Public School
      • Holding Kids Back Doesn’t Help Them
      • National Association of School Psychologists on Retention
      • Fear and Loathing in a Florida School
    • Archive
      • History
      • Observer articles & coverage
      • Statements to BOE
        • Equity – history
          • Comparing student scores at CMS middle schools
      • DNC 2012
        • DNC Media Coverage
        • Pam and Carol’s Excellent Students First Adventure
        • Moms on the Loose: Pam and Carol Meet DFER
        • A Better Place: Reflections on Education and the DNC
      • #1DayTA

    Testing and SB 795

    June 4, 2012

      The NC House and Senate are currently considering legislation that will increase testing madness and weaken public schools. Last year, it was your timely e-mails that helped kill HB 546 and stall testing madness in CMS. E-mail legislators about Senate Bill 795 TODAY! We’ve posted easy to copy e-mail addresses for legislators here.

      SB 975 is a grab-bag of “reform” proposals. Specific parts of the proposal that would increase testing and/or raise test stakes include:

      • A-F grading of schools (Part III) will make the stakes higher on tests. The legislation would give each school a grade of A to F, based solely on students’ test score performance, and require that each grade be widely publicized.

      • Pay for Performance (Part X) requires each district to prepare a pay for performance plan for the 2013-14 school year. Districts are be instructed to use measures of student “growth” (read “standardized test scores”) in pay for performance calculations.

      • Replacing teacher career status with short-term contracts (Part XIV) will place pressure on teachers to produce high test scores at all costs year after year.

      Although the legislation includes a section supposedly dedicated to “minimizing the time students spent taking tests through State and local testing programs” (Part IV), that section misses the point entirely. As we all know, the damage done by high-stakes testing affects teaching and learning throughout the year, not simply on those days that tests are administered.

      Other sections of the bill concern us, including the legislators’ decision to mandate specific remedial reading strategies, more calendar shenanigans, and a provision that would require districts to grant a year-long leave of absence and a guaranteed return to any public schoolteacher who wished to move to a charter school.

      Background and ALEC Connections

      Most of these proposals were inspired by legislation passed in Florida, which has been promoted around the country by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a corporate-funded entity with connections to prominent testing companies such as Pearson and Scantron. Florida’s students are among the most tested in the nation

      Although Florida has seen a few general gains in test scores during the past decade, NONE of the Florida proposals being recommended for North Carolina has been directly linked to improvements in student performance (for more detail, see here). In addition, parents and school board members across Florida are currently in revolt over Florida’s heavy-handed state exams, as well as its methods for evaluating schools. The New York Times recently published a lengthy article on problems with Florida’s exams.

      These are not measures we want enacted in our state. SB 795 has passed the Senate, and is now in the House Education Committee. It’s time to email the Education Committee, as well as your own Senator and Representative.

      The most effective letters mention the bill number (SB 795), and relate in specific, personal terms why you oppose (or support) a bill and its provisions. The official Mecklenburg ACTS letter can be found on our Facebook page.

      Thank you!

      Related Posts

      Testing /

      Back to School, Back to Testing

      Testing /

      Sign the Resolution Against High-Stakes Testing

      ‹ Sign the Resolution Against High-Stakes Testing › Legislative Update

      Recent Posts

      • Moving On
      • Human endeavor vs. business transaction
      • Thoughts on CMS Assignment
      • New State Superintendent sticks with testing status quo
      • FairTest Issues New Assessment Recommendations

      Previous Posts

      Back to Top

      © Mecklenburg ACTS 2023